Comparison
SerpKite vs Scrapingdog
Scrapingdog is one of the cheapest Google APIs at volume. SerpKite costs more at volume and adds non-expiring credits and agent features.
We make SerpKite
Summary
The short version
Scrapingdog's Light plans reach $0.29 per 1k at 1M and $0.136 at its best list price, with AI Mode, Lens and Trends. SerpKite is $0.60 at 1M self-serve, never expires credits and ships Markdown output and an MCP server.
Choose Scrapingdog if…
- Pure price per 1k at high, steady volume is the only criterion.
- You need Google Trends today.
- You use your monthly credits fully every month.
Choose SerpKite if…
- Your usage is uneven and monthly credits go to waste. Ours never expire.
-
You need LLM-ready output,
fields=projection and an official MCP server. - You want spend caps, per-key limits and failed/empty results never billed.
Differences
What actually differs
Price
Around 100k/month: Scrapingdog $0.45 vs SerpKite $0.60. Around 1M: $0.29 vs $0.60. Best list: $0.136 vs $0.60. At ~$50 SerpKite is cheaper ($0.80 vs $1.00).
Credit expiry
Scrapingdog credits are monthly. SerpKite credits never expire.
Engines
Scrapingdog also covers Bing and Brave. SerpKite adds them in Q1 2027.
Features
Feature comparison
| SerpKite | Scrapingdog | |
|---|---|---|
| Real Google results | ||
| Google web + core verticals News, Images, Maps, Shopping, Scholar… | ||
| ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini answers | Planned | |
| Bing / DDG / Brave / Yandex | Planned (Q1 2027) | Bing, Brave |
| Markdown output | ||
| Resolved final URLs (post-/goto) | Guaranteed | |
| Page content in the same call | include_content | |
| Async batch + webhooks | 50% off | |
| Official SDKs TypeScript, Python, Go; LangChain and CrewAI tools | TS, Python, Go | |
| Official MCP server | ||
| Credits never expire | ||
| Spend caps and per-key limits | ||
| Failed / empty results free | Incl. empty-200 detection | |
| Public status with latency | p50 / p95 | |
| No query logs / DPA SerpKite: No query logs · results cached ≤ 24 h, no identity | Default | |
| Legal shield | No (honest policy) | |
| SOC 2 | Planned |
Check = yes, cross = no, dash = not verified. SerpKite rows marked "Planned" are on the roadmap, not live.
Price
Price per 1,000 Google searches
| SerpKite | Scrapingdog | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 2,500 on signup + 1,000/mo, no card | 100 credits |
| Entry, ~$50 pack $ per 1k searches | $0.80 | $1.00 |
| ~100k searches / month $ per 1k | $0.60 | $0.45 |
| ~1M searches / month $ per 1k | $0.60 | $0.29 |
| Best public list price $ per 1k | $0.60 | $0.14 |
| Credit expiry | Never | Monthly |
Public list prices for Google web search, verified on vendor pages on 2026-09-28. "Entry" is the ~$50 pack or plan (SerpKite also has a $10 pack at $1.00 per 1k). SerpKite's self-serve packs stop at 500K credits; larger volumes are quoted on request. Expiring credits raise the effective price if you don't use them in time. See SerpKite pricing.
Verdict
Our take
If you spend the same large amount every month and want the lowest number, Scrapingdog wins on list price. If your usage varies, or you're building agents, SerpKite's terms and output formats can cost less in practice.
Try it
One request to compare for yourself
curl https://api.serpkite.com/v1/search \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SERPKITE_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"q":"best espresso machine 2026","country":"us","format":"markdown"}'1 credit per page of 10 results, SERP features included. Run it in the playground without signing up.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Start building
Get your API key in 30 seconds
2,500 free credits, then 1,000 every month. No credit card.